Brainsell.com Privacy Statement  |  Site Map  |  Blog

Contact Us

1-978-887-3870

 


February 7, 2011 [ 1 Comments ]

SalesLogix Web Brings Back Memories

It’s often forgotten why or how certain CRM applications became popular, specifically in light of competitive products who build amazing brand awareness (e.g.  Salesforce.com).  SalesLogix is just one of those applications.  I remember in the late 90′s when SalesLogix was the new challenger in the mid market. It dominated the market with functionality that allowed the small to mid sized companies afford a powerful solution without spending the monies required to run an application like Siebel ( of course what small company ever could afford to run Siebel?). 

In addition, SalesLogix offered easy to use functionality.  You’d get all of the great things we took for granted like drag and drop functionality and right mouse button clicking that made it easy to navigate and fast to use.  Easy to use has always been the creed when trying to advance end user adoption and SalesLogix seemed to take it’s lead from it’s little brother application, ACT! .

Today, when I review all of the CRM applications on the market, even I forget about the little things that make it easy to use sofware.  I suppose my biggest gripe today with the more popular web interface products is the lack of true windows client functionality and the speed to perform certain tasks as I did in a windows client. 

I was recently using the SalesLogix Web Cloud product I had an epiphany.  The folks at Sage incorporated many of those windows client elements that I liked so much.  I found right mouse button clicking  made the web experience much easier to navigate rather than having to click through multiple links like other web applications.  I was able to drag and drop emails and documents onto the SalesLogix screen from my desktop right into the account record. I missed those little nuances in other web CRM applications I’ve used or test driven. Bottom line, it’s the little things that count.

November 29, 2010 [ 1 Comments ]

Microsoft CRM vs. SalesLogix

Posted by: Sonja Fridell
Tags:

Microsoft CRM is the new kid on the CRM block, debuting in 2003 and Sage SalesLogix has been a leader in the market for 13 years. There are differences across the board in both applications. For many users, it’s a matter of look and feel. Others are more concerned with functionality.

Some of the larger differences in the two solutions are user adoption, ease of use, architecture, TCO and partner support.

These points and more are addressed in BrainSell’s latest White Paper.

You can download the paper at no cost

microsoft crm vs. saleslogix

September 17, 2010 [ 1 Comments ]

Salesforce.com vs. SalesLogix

Posted by: Sonja Fridell
Tags: ,

salesforce vs. sage saleslogixSalesforce.com and SalesLogix by Sage Software are two popular Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems. They serve the same general purpose: software that helps companies track customer/employee interactions, lead management, planning, calendar capabilities and much more.

Salesforce.com has been in existence for 10 years and is only offered as a software as a service (SaaS), i.e as a subscription model. SalesLogix has been around for 14 years and was previously install only. However, in 2010 Sage released SalesLogix Cloud. Customers can now choose to deploy SalesLogix on the web, SaaS (Cloud), mobile, and LAN (installed).

There are similarities in both Salesforce and SalesLogix. But also some significant differences. Such as functionality and data storage.

For an entire product comparison:

Download BrainSell’s White Paper Here.

May 19, 2010 [ 0 Comments ]

Sage is more than Software – Again

brainsell president jim wardSitting at the airport in Denver, Colorado, I’m reflecting on my week at Sage’s annual conference for business partners, Sage Insights. I remember when we first became acquainted with Sage in 2001. At that time we were a SalesLogix reseller and the company that owned SalesLogix (Interact Commerce) sold to Sage (know at that time as Best Software due to naming trademark issues in North America).

My first impressions of Sage were that we had finally found a vendor focused on the business partner and helping our company deliver great products and teaching us how to be the best service vendors. Over the years, there have been various leadership changes that had taken the blush off the rose a bit. Don’t get the wrong impression, it’s been my personal opinion, that Sage still provided business partners like us the best partner programs in the software industry, bar none.

Today, while awaiting my flight, I’m feeling like I did back in 2001. Excited, refreshed and confident. This new Sage under its current leadership has invigorated this company in North America. There’s a commitment to its product lines, and now heavily focused in the customer experience. Something I’ve personally taken so seriously that I truly believe that one can no longer create customer satisfaction. Satisfaction simply isn’t enough. One must create customer delight!

Read full article…

April 28, 2010 [ 2 Comments ]

Sage CRM Software Director on Compensation – Let’s Just Go Sell!

Posted by: Sonja Fridell
Tags: , , ,

Guest blog by Seth Ellertson, Director of Sales East for Sage CRM

As Sage is rapidly approaching the advent of our new and exciting cloud offering for SalesLogix CRM, we’re tasked with advising our partners on how to appropriately motivate and compensating their sales people in this new world.    While there is no question our partner and customers are anxiously awaiting our new offer, I can’t help but think that this changes the game for sales compensation.  The old days were easy – you gave a sales representative a quota for license sales and paid them against achievement.  It was really that easy.  The only real question was how much to make their quota and how much to pay them, but of course that could be solved pretty easily by some revenue and cost modeling done by accounting people much smarter in the ways of finance than myself.     Sales people had a license revenue target that they achieved by securing upfront software license purchases. 

The SASS and Cloud offerings require a bit more thought, although according to Joel York in his March 2010 article SaaS Sales Compensation Made Easy, “The ONLY difference between SaaS sales compensation and sales compensation for software or other products is that you should pay based on the “LIFETIME VALUE of THE DEAL” instead of the unit price of the product.     Unfortunately, It didn’t appear that simple from the rest of his article.  Joel actually goes on to talk about present values of annuity’s and other financial calculations that I just simply couldn’t focus enough of my attention deficit mind around in my most boring college classes.   (Trust me there is a reason I’m in sales)   Joel then goes to provide the following formula – SaaS Subscription LTV=RR = RR (1-a)/(1=i) + RR ……… ok, I can’t find the symbols on the key board for the rest of it.  Needless to say that’s where Joel lost me. 

So I started to think about all of the reasons that a re-occurring model was different from a traditional sales model and the questions surrounding the differences -  Should a sales representatative be paid upfront despite the company receiving payments in monthly or quarterly increments?  Do you pay on total contract value or reoccurring revenue?  If you pay on reoccurring revenue how to you motivate someone to secure a multi-year contract.   What if a customer cancels their contract?   As I’m researching options, one thing continues to come to my mind –COMPENSATION DRIVES MOTIVATION.  

As we’ve rolled out dozens of different sales models over the years the only real question that sales people have is – what exactly do I need to do to make exactly how much money.    So what does that mean for a small business owner or a VP of sales looking to change a compensation model… well its simple I think (although I’m clearly not as financially educated as Joel)   -  First make sure the plan is easy to understand and calculate, remember us sales people like thinks simple.   Second make sure that you align compensation with corporate goals.    If your corporate goal is to acquire 100 new customers this year, then base a sales representative on customer acquisition.  If your goal is to secure 5 million or 500 million in annual re-occurring revenue, then base them on those targets.    The only real thing to be careful about according to Joel (yes, I really did read his whole article, it was quite insightful) is to make sure that you choose a time frame for the reoccurring target like monthly, quarterly and yearly and stick with that timeframe, as changing it periodically has serious impact.

So at the end of the day figure out a reoccurring revenue target by doing some projections and modeling and pay your people for achieving those targets.  Couldn’t be easier… after all sales people aren’t compensated for managing cash flow they are compensated for closing deals.  

I found a great quote in a pdf presentation I found on sales compensation -

“Most of the time was spent discussing our business plans and objectives and worrying less about paying too much or too little” Steve Balk, VP Sales, Dataflux    

Steve, I don’t know who you are, but I like your style.   I couldn’t agree with you more, although I selfishly favor paying salespeople too much.  Lets figure out how to achieve our business objectives and if we overpay our salespeople a bit in the first year because we achieved those objectives – who cares, let’s just go sell!

April 27, 2010 [ 1 Comments ]

7 Ways to Build Business in a Tough Economy

As I look around I’ve noticed competitors selling their businesses, closing their doors or simply getting small. It’s not just my competition, it’s the business world around us.  Whether you’re starting a business or want to build your business in this economy, here’s 7 simple ideas to consider.

building business 1.  Acquire:  Growth through aqcuisition could be your key to future growth. Find businesses within your industry that are distressed or tired. Or stretch a bit and add a business that has synergy with your core business.  But don’t wander too far from your core business. Look for a business that adds to your cross-sell initiative since new customers are hard to find in a tough economy.

2. Inbound Marketing:  Invest wisely in marketing. Although traditional marketing still has it’s place, use your spare time or consider getting your marketing folks onboard with Inbound Marketing initiatives.  Become a thought leader within your industry.  Use the web to get found by your buyers. Today, people want to buy rather than being sold too. Using Inbound Marketing (blogs, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Social Media like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and more) help your potential buyers find your company when they are ready to purchase. Inbound marketing creates credibility with your buying audience and it’s cost effective! It’s also timely since people who find you are already in the buying /sales cycle. Read the book Inbound Marketing. It’s full of ah-hah moments that will get you rolling with new marketing strategies.  Check your web site grade against your competition with this free tool; website grader.  Here’s a shout out to our friends at Hubspot for a great product too!

Read full article…

Subscribe

Most Popular Posts


Social Media